WR121, Academic Composition, focuses on rhetorical reading, thinking, and writing as means of inquiry. Students will gain fluency with key rhetorical concepts and utilize these in a flexible and collaborative writing process, reflecting on their writing process with the goal of developing metacognitive awareness. They will employ conventions, including formal citations, appropriate for a given writing task, attending to the constraints of audience, purpose, genre, and discourse community. Students will compose in two or more genres. They will produce 3000-3500 words of revised, final draft copy or an appropriate multimodal analog for this amount of text. If the focus is primarily multimodal, students will produce at least one essay that integrates research and demonstrates an understanding of the role of an assertive thesis in an academic essay of at least 1000 words.
Focus = Source Evaluation, Ethical Use of Source Materials
WR 121 is the first moment in the undergraduate curriculum where research is a required outcome and it is a critical time for library instruction support. WR 121 students begin navigating research landscapes where they encounter a variety of sources using the online library and other types of internet searching. Students learn how to distinguish between popular and scholarly sources, and how to choose credible sources to integrate into their own writing. While scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles are discussed, the focus is on choosing credible sources that compliment but do not overwhelm the student's voice. Students are encouraged to be very choosey about what they use in their own work, and they will practice integrating source material with eloquence and integrity. All sources are cited. Librarians encourage students to develop metacognitive awareness by prompting them to reflect on their Information Literacy knowledge practices and dispositions throughout the composition process.
WR 121 Course Outcomes: Research and Documentation
You need state this question only once, at the head of your first page. It should apply to all your sources. Your eventual claim or thesis statement will be the answer to this question.
One of your sources MUST be a scholarly source; the others can be serious popular sources. Most of your sources should be accessed through the library.
Write both a correct MLA and a correct APA citation (entries for a Works Cited page and a Reference list).
Remember that citations from databases are often not correct; they need to be checked against the most recent [MLA 8th edition and APA 6th edition] guidelines in The Chemeketa Handbook and modified to match the appropriate models.
The type of source (For example, is it a book, magazine article, newspaper article, website from a reputable organization, or an academic publisher? Is it a reference work, serious popular source, or peer-reviewed scholarly source? If it is a scholarly source, from which section/s of the source was the information found?)
Reasons it appears to be this type of source
How and where the source was located (For example, was it found through a library search, library database, or general internet search?)*
*For a book, note whether it is an eBook or print copy and cite accordingly. For a database source, give the name of the database. (NOTE: Gale PowerSearch is NOT a database name). For an Internet source, give the name of the website.
III. Last, using the information you have gathered from annotating these sources, revise and narrow your original research question.
Department of Liberal Arts & Social Studies | English Program
WR 121 Assessment: Annotated Bibliography Assignment
Question | Yes | No | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
1. Does this AB use at least one scholarly source? Use the comment section to state the number of scholarly sources used. | |||
2. In this AB, are sources other than the scholarly source serious popular sources? | |||
3. Does this AB correctly and consistently use both required documentation styles (MLA or APA)? |
Criterion | Proficient=meets assignment objectives (A 0r B) | Competent=meets nearly all assignment objectives (C) | Emerging= begins to meet assignment objectives (D) | Does Not Meet (F) | No Basis to Evaluate= did not attempt | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifies and differentiates the kinds of sources used (Wb, ILcde)* |
||||||
Evaluates information and its source critically (Wb, ILcde)* |
||||||
Demonstrates understanding of how information from different sources might contribute to project and its argument (Wbc, ILacde)* |
||||||
Meets objectives of this assignment overall (Wabc, ILabcdef) |
* Denotes State of Oregon AAOT Writing and Information Literacy Outcomes
Chemeketa Community College Library | library.chemeketa.edu | 503.399.5231 | E-mail Reference Librarians